PhpDig.net - View Single Post

Charter · 01-19-2005, 03:02 AM

So + works for your type of [ ] links, right? I'm not sure if you are still having a problem with [ ] type links, but remember to use + in those two regexs.

PhpDig tries to follow simple window.location and window.open JavaScript links, even if the links are like those you posted. There is no nice and simple way to deal with JavaScript, as people can script in different ways. If you don't want PhpDig to deal with JavaScript, then either remove the related window.whatever stuff from the regex, edit the $allowed_link_chars variable, or use the FORBIDDEN_EXTENSIONS constant to exclude links.

See http://www.phpdig.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1430 for how phpdigExclude and phpdigInclude work, and for alternative methods to exclude links.

01-19-2005, 03:02 AM	#15
Charter Head Mole Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,539	So + works for your type of [ ] links, right? I'm not sure if you are still having a problem with [ ] type links, but remember to use + in those two regexs. PhpDig tries to follow simple window.location and window.open JavaScript links, even if the links are like those you posted. There is no nice and simple way to deal with JavaScript, as people can script in different ways. If you don't want PhpDig to deal with JavaScript, then either remove the related window.whatever stuff from the regex, edit the $allowed_link_chars variable, or use the FORBIDDEN_EXTENSIONS constant to exclude links. See http://www.phpdig.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1430 for how phpdigExclude and phpdigInclude work, and for alternative methods to exclude links. __________________ Responses are offered on a voluntary if/as time is available basis, no guarantees. Double posting or bumping threads will not get your question answered any faster. No support via PM or email, responses not guaranteed. Thank you for your comprehension.